Author: Rajarshi Tripathi (Rajarshi Tripathi)

Home Rajarshi Tripathi
Madhya Pradesh High Court directs the medical student to serve at the community health center as a bail condition
Post

Madhya Pradesh High Court directs the medical student to serve at the community health center as a bail condition

By – Yash Rawat The Gwalior Bench of Madhya Pradesh state supreme court recently directed a student to render her services at a regional hospital or a community health center each alternate Sunday for a year, as a condition for bail [Dr. Neha Padam v. Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI)]. A Division Bench of Justices...

Delhi court seeks response from Delhi Police on plea against Suresh Chavhanke
Post

Delhi court seeks response from Delhi Police on plea against Suresh Chavhanke

By – Yash Rawat An urban center|city|metropolis|urban center}|city|metropolis|urban center} court has wanted the response of the Delhi Police on a criminal application against Sudarshan TV president and editor-in-chief Suresh Chavhanke for his alleged hate speech against Muslims at an occasion organized by the ‘Hindu Yuva Vahini’ in Delhi. The application was filed by Syed Qasim...

Bulli Bai case: Accused Neeraj Singh, Aumkareshwar Thakur remanded to judicial custody
Post

Bulli Bai case: Accused Neeraj Singh, Aumkareshwar Thakur remanded to judicial custody

By – Poorva Singh A Mumbai court on Thursday remanded Aumkareshwar Thakur and Neeraj Singh, blamed in the Bulli Bai application case, to legal authority. The Court additionally expanded the police authority of the Bulli Bai App originator Neeraj Bishnoi till January 31, 2022. Advocate Shivam Deshmukh, showing up for Thakur, went against police care...

BREAKING: Alapan Bandyopadhyay moves Delhi High Court challenging CAT principal Bench order
Post

BREAKING: Alapan Bandyopadhyay moves Delhi High Court challenging CAT principal Bench order

By – Nancy Kumari Former West Bengal Chief Secretary Alapan Bandyopadhyay has approached the Delhi High Court challenging the order passed by Central Administrative Tribunal, Star Bench which had transferred his solicitation filed before the Kolkata Bench to the Star Bench at New Delhi. The solicitation filed through Advocate Kunal Mimani states that the impugned...

NCDRC Issues Directions For Computation Of Limitation Period After Supreme Court Restores Limitation Extension
Post

NCDRC Issues Directions For Computation Of Limitation Period After Supreme Court Restores Limitation Extension

By – Nancy Kumari After the Supreme Court of India’s recent order extended the limitation period for filing cases and operations in wake of the swell in COVID-19 cases, the Public Consumer Disagreement Redressal Commission has issued directions to its Registry for compliance and calculation of the limitation period. Taking note of the swell in...

Consent Of Accused Not Necessary To Obtain Voice Sample; No Violation Of Article 20(3) Of Constitution: Kerala High Court
Post

Consent Of Accused Not Necessary To Obtain Voice Sample; No Violation Of Article 20(3) Of Constitution: Kerala High Court

By – Alankriti Narayan The Kerala High Court bench led by Justice R. Narayana Pisharadi has ruled that an accused’s consent is not required to obtain their voice sample for the purposes of comparison because it has already been established that obtaining the accused’s voice sample does not violate Article 20 (3) of the Indian...

SC Orders Extending Period Of Limitation Applicable To Proceedings & Orders Passed Under Payment Of Gratuity Act: Delhi High Court
Post

SC Orders Extending Period Of Limitation Applicable To Proceedings & Orders Passed Under Payment Of Gratuity Act: Delhi High Court

By – Alankriti Narayan The Delhi High Court has stated that the Supreme Court’s judgment to extend the statute of limitations will apply to decisions made by authorities under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The Supreme Court, in In Re: Cognizance for Extension of Limitation, issued an order on September 23, 2021, extending the...

Allowing illegally intercepted telephonic conversations as evidence violation of fundamental rights: Delhi High Court
Post

Allowing illegally intercepted telephonic conversations as evidence violation of fundamental rights: Delhi High Court

By – Sonal Priya The Delhi High Court has held that allowing wrongfully caught messages and sound discussions as proof would prompt manifest assertion and advance infringement of the central freedoms of residents [Jatinder Pal Singh v CBI]. Equity Chandra Dhari Singh said that according to Section 5(2) of the Telegraph Act, a request for...